Employment letters state the terms of agreement between an employer and an employee; I will be considering the teacher as an employee to whom we are considering inserting a clause that his salary be based on his/her students’ performance. This clause would mean that the teachers contribution would be evaluated outrightly based on his students’ academic performance. While this might be a motivation to spur the teacher into action; it could be demoralising on the longer run as students’ academic performance might not be the right judge of a teacher’s contribution. Hence, I am against this claim and would rather support that teachers’ salaries should be determined aforehand, while students’ academic performance could be factored in for other benefits such as increment, promotions and appraisals.
It is essential that teachers are thoroughly evaluated and screened before being employed as this will give the employers faith in their teachers. Based on this faith, a salary could be agreed upon. Students’ academic performance should be objectively reviewed and included among the metrics used to judge the teachers contribution. This will provide motivation for the teacher to deliver his best.
Students’ academic performance are affected by myriads of factor which might not have a bearing on the teachers performance. Some of these factors include: genes inherited from the parents, care and attention given by the parents, self-motivation of the students, peer pressure just to mention a few. It would be unfair on the teacher if his/her salary are determined and affected by factors beyond his control.
More so, basing teacher’s salary on students’ performance could create polarity in the income earned by teachers. For example, Federal Government College, Suleja (FGC, Suleja) in Nigeria is termed 'Gifted School' as it only admits the brightest students all over the country. If we are to compare a teacher in this school with a teacher in another School in Northern Nigeria (denoted as Educationally Less Developed State (ELDS)); it is obvious that the performance of the students at FGC Suleja would far outweigh their colleagues in ELDS. Consequently, the salaries of the teachers at Suleja would also outweigh their colleagues. Whereas, the teacher in Suleja might be exerting less effort when compared to his colleagues. This will do great injustice to the educational system.
Teachers are great pillars of nation building. Therefore, it is critical that they are remunerated properly for their services. It is essential that while schools are considering measures to improve teachers’ performance, it has to be objective to include all the factors that could affects teachers performance.
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 53
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner Over the past two years the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically Many Central 72
- The concept of cooperation rather than competition prepares young people for leadershipWrite a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most 50
- Teachers salary should be based on the academic performance of the students 66
- teachers salary 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...mance. This clause would mean that the teachers contribution would be evaluated outrigh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntribution would be evaluated outrightly based on his students academic performan...
^^
Line 1, column 545, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...mance might not be the right judge of a teachers contribution. Hence, I am against this...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ded among the metrics used to judge the teachers contribution. This will provide motivat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
.... More so, basing teachers salry on students performance could create polarity in th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 283, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'affect'
Suggestion: affect
...e to include all the factors that could affects teachers performance.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, therefore, whereas, while, as to, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2282.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36941176471 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90376584031 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482352941176 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7363530977 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.1 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.506322913143 0.243740707755 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159408333459 0.0831039109588 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121881504798 0.0758088955206 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292081114869 0.150359130593 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144320623349 0.0667264976115 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.