Regulations for handling and storing coal ash are unnecessary
The reading passage and the speaker both explore the topic of necessity of changing the regulation of handling coal ash. However, the speaker discords with the ideas in the reading passage. She casts doubt on the article for the following reasons.
First of all, the speaker opposes the idea related to the used of linear. Although the reading passage suggests that the regulation for the company to use linear can prevent the possible harm causing by coal ash; the speaker points out that the contaminant do exist and polluting the drinking water by giving the further explore of the regulation for the use of linear. Hence the speaker concludes that regulation is not sufficient.
Furthermore, while the article indicates that the consumers will question about the safety of buying the coal ash products, the speaker argues that there is other similar case which have an opposite outcome. Therefore, the speaker holds that it is irrational to suggest the consumers behavior will react in a more negative way.
Last but not least, the speaker refutes the reading passage by mentioning the increasing cost. Even though the passage states that general public will not be satisfy to the increasement of the price, the speaker rejects the idea by bringing up a reason that there will only be a slightly amount of growth for each household’s electricity bill. Thus, the speaker believes that there will make much difference for the consumer to notice the change.
To sum up, the speaker tends to disagree with the points in the reading passage because of the unconvincing arguments presented in the article.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-06 | xiao | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-06 | Allenwlh | 90 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | Oli_ve | 80 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | talelaldabous | 70 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 83
- Regulations for handling and storing coal ash are unnecessary 80
- Solutions to prevent injuries of glass to birds 80
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 370, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...f the regulation for the use of linear. Hence the speaker concludes that regulation i...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
...ds that it is irrational to suggest the consumers behavior will react in a more negative ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...st. Even though the passage states that general public will not be satisfy to the increasement...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 278, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('amount') instead of another adjective.
...ing up a reason that there will only be a slightly amount of growth for each household’s electric...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06766917293 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55897702015 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533834586466 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.7189177295 49.2860985944 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192097545045 0.272083759551 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725036751926 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904730280873 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107798196864 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885464825888 0.0443174109184 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.