Why do you think some people are attracted to dangerous sports or other dangerous activities? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I think there are many reasons for some people to be attracted to dangerous activities. I will be discussing some reasons in the following paragraphs.
First of all, I think those who are usually attracted to dangerous sports, for example, mount climbing, like taking up challenges in general. Hazardous sports are a big challenge in themselves. They demand a lot of patience, boldness, and physical strength to accomplish them. Sounds very challenging, right? So, these sports are likely to attract those who welcome challenges with an open arm. Mountain climbing is a difficult task. No matter the precautions you take, there is a chance that you can get into trouble or, even worse, you can die. Hence, it is only for those who are willing to give it a shot despite knowing all the consequences.
Furthermore, some people like these dangerous sports or activities because they might find them interesting for some personal reason of their own. Personal reasons could mean many things. I want to speak from my personal experience, I find scuba diving exciting, and I always wanted to try it because I like marine biology. I love to observe fishes and other aquatic animals. Scuba diving is a dangerous sport. There have been incidents of the shark attacks, but I am attracted to it because of my love for marine biology despite its dangers. A different person can like scuba diving because it is the only dangerous sport he has heard of. Some others might be attracted to it because they want to overcome their fears, such as fear of the dark.
Lastly, people can get attracted to a dangerous activity for no particular reason, and it is just that they like it and want to try it. There are many things which we are attracted to for no reason. This can also be applied in the case of dangerous activities. People might not have reason to like ski diving or any other hazardous sport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-05 | theprasad | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Alina_irfan | 70 | view |
| 2021-12-24 | AlexanderProust | 85 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | maryam15 | 60 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | maryam15 | 60 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions presented in the reading passage 80
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 62
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
- Some people like to do only what they already do well Other people prefer to try new things and take risks Which do you prefer give specific reasons and examples to support your choice 60
- Some people believe that in order to be effective political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently c 54
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, lastly, so, for example, i think, in general, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78353658537 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62316867651 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518292682927 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4250901177 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.3181818182 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9090909091 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95454545455 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291368023354 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914088669413 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845433725366 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207057953869 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058804874904 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 11.7677419355 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.85 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.002688172 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.