Which way do you think is better when choosing an interesting job?
A. Ask as many friends as possible both in person and through social media
B. Sending letters introducing yourself.
C. Looking for job advertisement.
Today's modern world views working of its citizen as a cornerstone of human civilization. With this in mind, job experts and ordinary people often debate whether which way of yeilding information about a job holds most value. Personally, I believe that seeking for suitable jobs through job advertisements is the best option for various reasons, two of which I shall touch upon to prove my perspective.
To begin with, looking for jobs advertisement is the efficent way of learning about jobs .Nowadays, people have hectic lifestyle and routine. They can not find time for their basic tasks, set aside looking for jobs requirment . Given the fact that there are various data stated in job ad, a quick glance at those will provide the data that applicants need to apply. Therefore it can save time and energy since one can look at whole bunch of them rapidly. My own experince illustrates this clearly. Two years ago I was searching for a job through the social media. In fact I have applied for some of them but since there were no specific information about the job itself, I wasted a lot of time searching for a suitable job. Then, I found an interesting job ads in street, and they needed a computer programmer, so I applied and got accepted. Had it not been for that flier, I would not have been able to land my dream job.
Another point worth mentioning is that given the fact that the requirements usually are stated in job ads, applicants are able to find whether it suits them best or not. In this day and age, the range of jobs are pretty wide. One can examine the qualifications closely to see that whether the job suits ones best or not. Whether one preceives this intresting is quite related to the jobs requirement. For example, in my aformentioned job application. employer managed to explicitly state his requirement. In that filer, there were said that they needed a proffesional programmer with 3 years experince and some background Knowledge of statistics. Knowing this, I understanded that I found my dream job since I am really into statistics.
To conclude, having considered all points discussed previously, I firmly believe that looking for job advertisement is a beneficial move to land an interseting job. This is because not only can it save time and energy but it also garentees landing a well-fitted job.
- TPO45 The coin founded in Maine site is genuine 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important problem affecting society can be solved in your lifetime 90
- Did Bees exist 200 million years ago 73
- Which way do you think is better when choosing an interesting job A Ask as many friends as possible both in person and through social media B Sending letters introducing yourself C Looking for job advertisement 70
- Do you agree with the following statement Raising the price of gasoline and electricity is the only effective way to save energy 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the efficent way of learning about jobs .Nowadays, people have hectic lifestyle a...
^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Nowadays
...he efficent way of learning about jobs .Nowadays, people have hectic lifestyle and routi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s, set aside looking for jobs requirment . Given the fact that there are various d...
^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...the data that applicants need to apply. Therefore it can save time and energy since one c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'bunch'.
Suggestion: bunch
...e time and energy since one can look at whole bunch of them rapidly. My own experince illus...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...osely to see that whether the job suits ones best or not. Whether one preceives this...
^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...whether the job suits ones best or not. Whether one preceives this intresting is quite ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'jobs'' or 'job's'?
Suggestion: jobs'; job's
...this intresting is quite related to the jobs requirement. For example, in my aformen...
^^^^
Line 5, column 452, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Employer
...e, in my aformentioned job application. employer managed to explicitly state his require...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, really, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1940.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82587064677 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80965409117 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8848665651 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1818181818 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13636363636 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270316526303 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881830410905 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687856028888 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183481813907 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499822060755 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.