The table displays how many people visited Ashdown museum in the year prior to and year following refurbishment.The pie chart illustrate the details regarding satisfaction level of individuals who have come on the same year.
Overall, it is evident that there was a significant increase in the number of tourist after its renovation. In addition, the review of the sightseers were outstanding after the refurbishment.
Looking at the table in detail, 74,000 people visited the museum prior to restoration, and it elevated to 92,000 after restructuring. A rapid rise of 18,000 individuals was evident. With regards to the satisfaction level before rebuilding 15% were very satisfied, and it doubled when it come satisfied one. 40% completely got dissatisfied and around 5% of people have not given their response. But the following year after renovation, 40% of individuals remained satisfied, and 35% were very satisfied.Eventually the dissatisfied reduced to 15%. However, visitors who haven't responded remained the same in both year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ior to and year following refurbishment.The pie chart illustrate the details regard...
^^^
Line 5, column 503, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Eventually
... satisfied, and 35% were very satisfied.Eventually the dissatisfied reduced to 15%. Howeve...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...d reduced to 15%. However, visitors who havent responded remained the same in both yea...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, regarding, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5125 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35016324229 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60625 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.6083425879 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259429902826 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934191703138 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578594807559 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168899142934 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492437527477 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.