It is always an individual who is the impetus for innovation; the details may be worked out by a team, but true innovation results from the enterprise and unique perception of an individual.
Innovations are important in the advancement of the human race. Innovator(s) seeks to find a lasting solution to one of the challenges of life. The innovators of the first antibiotics, electric light, motor car, aeroplane, Facebook, Twitter etc are all well documented.
However, it is difficult to truly attribute an innovation to an individual. Several people could have worked on the idea before the supposed innovator. For example, the Wright brothers were credited with the innovation of the aeroplane, however the idea of the aeroplane has been mooted for several decades before the Wright brothers successfully flew an airplane.
Also, Mark Zuckerberg and his friend started Facebook in the early 2000s to connect people across the Atlantic Ocean, people from diverse backgrounds and who would have never met. This is truly an innovation which have redefined friendship across the world. But can this innovation be truly credited to Zuckerberg?
It is widely accepted today that Zuckerberg even though he is the Chief Executive Officer of Facebook is not the only innovator of the social media giant. His college friend who started the idea together with him is also fairly credited for the emergence of Facebook.
In addition, Michael Faraday is credited as the innovator of the electric bulb. He achieved this feat after several attempts. However, the physics behind the electric bulb have been known long before Faraday employed it in the creation of the electric bulb.
Today Nobel prize winners are usually a group of people who have worked together to achieve a common goal. It follows that complex problems usually require the effort of a team.
In conclusion, it could be true that the thought process of an individual could be the major force behind the realisation of an innovation, but we cannot ignore the effort of the team members in the process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-12 | TE | 66 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | Balqees Bakare | 50 | view |
- It is always an individual who is the impetus for innovation the details may be worked out by a team but true innovation results from the enterprise and unique perception of an individual 50
- A memo 53
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation and not competition 50
- From a letter to the editor of a city newspaper One recent research study has indicated that many adolescents need more sleep than they are getting and another study has shown that many high school students in our city are actually dissatisfied with their 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 305.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13770491803 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67535760155 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.6963960008 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1764705882 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270529795358 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081282801333 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626362054623 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116238195101 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619082787096 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.