The graph below gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010
The given bar chart illustrates coffee production in Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia, and Vietnam between 1990 and 2010. Generally, except for Colombia, every figure experienced upswings. In addition, Brazil's data always took first place during the period.
In detail, coffee production in Brazil was well beyond the others at nearly 0,7 million tonnes in 1990, roughly 0,1 million tonnes higher than Colombia’s data. Following that were the figures for Indonesia and Vietnam, resulting in 0,2 million tonnes and around 0,1 million tonnes respectively. During the duration, the amount of coffee produced in Brazil witnessed an enormous growth to triple its data in 2010. In the meantime, that in Colombia was twice as low as its initial figure over the 10-year period and finally decreased by more nearly 0,1 million tonnes in 2010. Moreover, the coffee production in Indonesia gradually rose to double in size in 2010 after staying unchanged for the first five years. Interestingly, that was also the case of Vietnam, which tripped its initial figure and ranked at the third place along with Colombia at the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-09 | wholemilk | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | linhchang | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the ma 89
- Research says more and more business training and business meetings are taking place online Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- young people who commit crimes should be treated in the same as adults who commit crimes. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riple its data in 2010. In the meantime, that in Colombia was twice as low as its...
^^
Line 2, column 640, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: double
...oduction in Indonesia gradually rose to double in size in 2010 after staying unchanged for the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, moreover, so, third, well, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26404494382 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56007851832 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589887640449 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3803372299 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124488713332 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592735291192 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655561435726 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10903192829 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00398247095739 0.0819641961636 5% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.