Employers should focus on personal qualities instead of qualifications and experience when choosing someone for job. At what extent do you agree?
In this competitive epoch, entrepreneurs are in a hush to hire productive staff. A common thought has prevailed that individuals personal attributes should be more focused while hiring than their experience and study by director. Here, I am partially agree with this notion.
There are manifold points to shore up the former view, that this approach would bonafide for freshers. As it is conspicuous , that newly graduates are lack of experience and face troubles to find a valuable job. Moreover, people who are less qualified but adroit acquire reputated job. Apart from this, qualifications does not define someone‘s creativity and knowledge. In addition to this, it has observed by a survey that people who are generous and polite owned a great character, it assist them to build up a positive and prolific atmosphere at workplace.
Numerous points can be mentioned to support latter view, that experience and high qualifications aids to cope up precisely with technical menaces. Furthermore, the probability of mistakes and unprosper decisions get plummeted and this attracts handsome packages (salaries). Despite this, experienced and well-educated staff dipped the requirements of redundant people at institutes who are burden on the managing director. Additionally, experienced and educated people are much respected than others .
To recapitulate, from above confabulation both aspects are necessary to select an employee. The reason is personal skills / qualities are prolific for the individual himself to attain a respectful place in the organization with positive outcomes and experience, high-education assist one to guide and leads a constructive path to make the root stronger of a company.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-30 | Aarti SHARMAa | 78 | view |
- The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from the suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 78
- The chart below shows the sleep pattern of people in five different occupations according to a Canadian study Summarise the information 84
- Some believe children should be taught to give speeches and presentations in school Why is this Should this be taught in schools 78
- Employers should focus on personal qualities instead of qualifications and experience when choosing someone for job At what extent do you agree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...study by director. Here, I am partially agree with this notion. There are manifold p...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...afide for freshers. As it is conspicuous , that newly graduates are lack of experi...
^^
Line 2, column 487, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'assists'?
Suggestion: assists
... and polite owned a great character, it assist them to build up a positive and prolifi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ments of redundant people at institutes who are burden on the managing director. Additi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ed people are much respected than others . To recapitulate, from above confabulat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57307692308 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19197840899 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661538461538 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.450267077 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144963496658 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425972983218 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367597182145 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0800749405116 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271526092463 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.