The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph reveals information on the proportion of three distinguished types of turtle population in comparison with the figure for all species in India from 1980 to 2012. From a quick glance, the population of general creatures fluctuated over the given period, simultaneously, the statistic of Olive Ridley Turtles witnessed a noticeable upward trend which is contradictory in terms of Leatherback and Green turtles.
When taking a closer look at the proportion of the Olive Ridley Turtles, the figures commenced at exactly 100% which was equal to other categories before a considerable increase of over 30% took place in the period of 16 years beginning in 1980. In 1996, the percentage of Olive Ridley Turtles reached a peak at above 130% and fluctuated until 2012. Nevertheless, the figure for the population of total animals in India fluctuated minimally around 100%.
Moving on to analyse the remaining categories, the ratio of Green Turtles initially encountered a wide fluctuation around its original data from 1980 and 1998, followed by a steady decline of approximately 20% in the next two years. In the last decade of the given time, the statistic remained almost unchanged. More considerably, the population figure for Leatherback Turtles initiatively climbed to the highest point at over 110%. In contrast, a consecutive sharp fall was recorded that made the figure dive to just over 50%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-30 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-30 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-14 | aspirant | 56 | view |
| 2020-05-28 | charlotte1412 | 71 | view |
| 2017-05-19 | elirya | 59 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 78
- The bar chart shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 78
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting anf reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Today many countries import food from different parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, nevertheless, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25663716814 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01099611094 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592920353982 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.856371965 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18820057814 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826005361373 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880068389374 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13590765029 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626197661278 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.