The line graph illustrates the figures for tourists that stopped by 4 different destinations in Brighton from 1980 to 2010.
Generally, it can be seen that the percentages of Pier and Pavilion increased significantly while the number of Art Gallery and Festival fell off. Besides that, the visit rates of Pavilion and Festival were always higher than others.
In the beginning, Pavilion started with a high number at about 24%. From then on, it increased steadily and spiked nearly 50% in 1995. However, since 1986, the percentage of tourists to the Pavilion dropped to under 40 percent . Turning to Pier, the starting point was not as high as Pavilion at approximately 10%. In two following decades, the figures for Pier had insignificant fluctuation between 10-15%,with 5 percent more or less every 5 years. Since 2000, it escaped from the lowest rank with the rise to over 20%.
Art Gallery had a similar beginning with the Pavilion, at about 24%. In 1985, it peaked at 40% and became the highest number among the others. Nevertheless, the opposite trend was true for the Art Gallery for the remaining years. With the Festival, there was only a slight drop from over 30% to under 30% in the final point.
The line graph illustrates the figures for tourists that stopped by 4 different destinations in Brighton from 1980 to 2010.
Generally, it can be seen that the percentages of Pier and Pavilion increased significantly while the number of Art Gallery and Festival fell off. Besides that, the visit rates of Pavilion and Festival were always higher than others.
In the beginning, Pavilion started with a high number at about 24%. From then on, it increased steadily and spiked nearly 50% in 1995. However, since 1986, the percentage of tourists to the Pavilion dropped to under 40 percent . Turning to Pier, the starting point was not as high as Pavilion at approximately 10%. In two following decades, the figures for Pier had insignificant fluctuation between 10-15%,with 5 percent more or less every 5 years. Since 2000, it escaped from the lowest rank with the rise to over 20%.
Art Gallery had a similar beginning with the Pavilion, at about 24%. In 1985, it peaked at 40% and became the highest number among the others. Nevertheless, the opposite trend was true for the Art Gallery for the remaining years. With the Festival, there was only a slight drop from over 30% to under 30% in the final point.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-12 | xuanmai2501 | 73 | view |
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- With the development of science technology and business in this day and age it has become a core factor that makes people focus on it Therefore art has faded and is less attractive than before In this essay I will clarify reasons for it and give possible 73
- The pie charts compare the amount of electricity produced using five different sources of fuel in two countries over two separate years Total electricity production increased dramatically from 1980 to 2000 in both Australia and France While the totals for 73
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph illustrates the figures for tourists that stopped by 4 different destinations in Brighton from 1980 to 2010 Generally it can be seen that the percentages of Pier and Pavilion increased significantly while the number of Art Gallery and Festi 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...estival were always higher than others. In the beginning, Pavilion started with ...
^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...the Pavilion dropped to under 40 percent . Turning to Pier, the starting point was...
^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing years. With the Festival, there was only a slight drop from over 30% to unde...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, nevertheless, then, while, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8932038835 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65852393991 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597087378641 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5595371795 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.5384615385 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8461538462 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409006844117 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132080302037 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158706325586 0.0843802449381 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286251112618 0.15604864568 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.173032695675 0.0819641961636 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.