Not all drivers obey the laws while driving on roads.
What are the reasons for this?
What can be done to fix this problem?
There are some cases in a society where drivers do not follow the rules when traveling on the roads. This essay will present a number of reasons for the wrong actions of some car owners and propose possible measures to handle them.
The first reason why road users ignore the driving regulations is that they are in emergency situations. For example, the drivers need to transport the people who have illnesses or accidents to the hospitals. In these cases, it is suitable for the car owners to break the rules and have a faster speed in order to save people. Furthermore, the lack of knowledge about the dangerous effects when traveling also contributes to the wrong actions of drivers. They just think it is a small action that can not cause any accidents to them and other drivers. When any accidents happen, they blame the road infrastructure or the responsibilities of the police.
Since such issues are serious, the government should take steps immediately to address the disobedience of drivers. Firstly, there is a need to build roads for emergency cases. People in these situations can use these roads to solve their problems without breaking the rules and causing dangerous effects to other car owners. The second suggestion is that the authorities need to organize some lessons or campaigns to provide awareness about the consequences that breaking rules bring to road users.
In conclusion, it seems that emergency situations and lack of knowledge are the primary causes behind the violation of the rules. Possible solutions would involve constructing the own roads emergency cases and raising the knowledge of effects when disobeying the regulations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-14 | Parmjit Singh8886 | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-22 | phuongquynh79 | 71 | view |
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works 67
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 89
- The three charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1992 and 2001
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, second, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76361913738 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6260000291 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.285714286 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136325466217 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463396999764 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380048253975 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784651327589 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348928471572 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.