The vertical bar chart elucidates the information regarding the level of food consumption by USA residents in the fast food hotels measured in percentage in the years 2003, 2006 and 2013.
Overall, the bar graph outlines that over the three years a large proportion of the public opted to enjoy their snack food once in a week, once or twice a month and several times a week in eateries. However, the public who come under the categories of visiting a cafeteria a few times in a year, every day and those never accounted for a very low rate all in all.
In the beginning years 2003 and 2006, the public who dined once a week in snack bars depicted a fair proportion of about 31% in the former year and rose to around 33% in latter year. Moreover, those who ate several times a week were nearly 16% and 20% individually. Alternatively, the count of the USA residents witnessed extremely lower rates for categories every day and never with approximately less than 5% for both.
In contrast, for the year 2013, it was observed that people reduced their consumption of outside food from every day(3%) to once a week(27%), and it reached a peak of over a third(34%) for those who choose to eat once or twice in a month. This was a total of nearly 9% rise from 2006. Additionally, the public who preferred a few times a year noted the same rate of about more than one tenth as in the previous year 2006.
- some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this case What can be done about this problem 89
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 84
- The breakthroughs in medical science are by far the most significant advances in world society over the last two centuries To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The maps below changes in the Spanish city of Castellon in recent times Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparations where relevant 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In the beginning years 2003 and 2006, the public who dined once a week in snac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, regarding, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48828125 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53151221153 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5234375 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.2129435531 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0734966655648 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360268268591 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566659410867 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0679664376842 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712205546252 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.