Many people are working longer and longer hours. What are the reasons and effects?
There is a tendency nowadays that workaholics become more common due to the increase in time-working. There are some reasons for this trend, and I am convinced that plenty of effects may be damage to individuals.
One of the primary reasons why people are at risk of becoming workaholics is that employees have ambitions to promote their positions. Due to the competitive labor market, workers are willing to accept heavy workloads as a way to prove their ability and get credibility from their bosses. As a result, their efforts from working longer can be repaid with the higher position in their offices. Another obvious reason is that more time-working means that more salaries and bonuses. This tendency is appropriate with people those to earn a living and support their families.
Extra work hours in long term can cause negative impacts on each individual’s health and their relationships. Working long hours not only results in physical fatigue and may also lead to mental health problems. The hectic schedule all days means that they do not have enough time to take part in any exercises and even the time for relaxing their mental thoughts. In addition, the more time in working, the less time for families or other relationships. Having close-knit relationships is incompatible with long hours at work. Immersing in the extra work can contribute to the lack of communication with others, leading to the break up of some relationships.
In conclusion, promotion in positions and the high salary are the main reasons explain why the tendency of more time-working. It is clear that the consequences may damage the health and relationships of workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- University education should be free to everyone regardless of income To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 56
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
- In the past most people used to travel to their place of work With the increased use of computers the internet and smartphones more and more people are starting to work from home What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f effects may be damage to individuals. One of the primary reasons why people ar...
^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...ealth problems. The hectic schedule all days means that they do not have enough time...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, so, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10256410256 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92302643011 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556776556777 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.8463600763 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.8666666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93333333333 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171240145202 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553919223045 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454186403131 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866998750856 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403075332365 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.