The graph below shows the percentage of part-time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart presents the proportion of workers who did part-time jobs in four different nations of the United Kingdom namely England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales in 1980 and 2010. Overall, there was a higher percentage of part-time employees in 2010 than in 1980 in all countries except for Northern Ireland.
In detail, Wales had the highest proportion of workers in both years, at over 30%. There was a similar increasing pattern in both England and Wales from 1980 to 2010. While the figure for workers doing part-time jobs in England rose to over 30%, this figure in Wales went up to 35%.
In terms of the two other countries, it is clear that the percentage of Scotland employees in 2010 registered at 20%, which was twice as much as that in 1980. There was a slight decrease in the proportion of part-time workers in Northern Ireland. Starting at 15% in 1980, this figure declined by 3% in 2010, leading to the lowest percentage compared with the three other countries at the same time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | hellocacban | view | |
| 2022-08-05 | kaushalpatel569 | 55 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | Elena Phan | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | Vuthungan | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | phuongquynh79 | 47 | view |
- The three charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1992 and 2001
- Many people are working longer and longer hours What are the reasons and effects 78
- The three charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1992 and 2001
- Some people believe that a gap year between school and university is a good idea while others disagree strongly Consider both sides of this debate and present your own opinion 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79428571429 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49208379326 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537142857143 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.335472409 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.875 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228167747963 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110301559739 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511196949228 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167913410516 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603446229041 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.