Nowadays people have free access to music and films online. Is this a positive or a negative development? Provide relevant examples from your own experience.
The pervasiveness of the internet has allowed people to reach for free entertainment media, such as music and movies. Although this may cause financial losses to corporations, the consumer still benefits. In my opinion, this is a positive for people and a negative for businesses.
People are benefitted by having an access to online media files because they are varities of movies and music that are available for free. In other words, they do not have to pay any significant amount of money to watch latest blockbusters or listen to their favourite artist, except paying the internet bill, which is nominal in most cases. Besides this, some online websites also allow users to download data, be it videos or music, that too without any charge.
Furthermore, online library have multitudes of films, ranging from local to international films and different genres, which people can capitalize on. Giving a personal example. Due to the pandemic, I was made redundant from my job. So I used this online platform to entertain myself and my family since we were confined to our home. This was particularly useful because I did not have to spend a lot of money to avail for gigantic entertainment resources. Online platforms, namely YouTube and Facebook, are invaluable for the poorer sections of society, since they can afford to entertainment themselves.
On the other hand, companies may encounter sizeable amount of loss due to less revenue from the sale of products. Individuals may completely stop purchasing movie tickets or music albums due to the availability of no-cost online options. However, businesses have found ways to recover this loss, for instance, by marketing their product with afflicted marketing and advertising. While they may not be to recover their complete loss, some profits is still generated by this.
To concluce, having a free opportunity to music and films online is definitely a plus point for the audience because they not only save money but also experience gratification without much effort. Nonetheless, this is injurious for the balancesheet of companies; therefore, many try to find ways to stop this loss.
- Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession Is this a positive or negative development 78
- There is too much noise in many public places in cities What are the causes of this problem What can be done to solve the problem 84
- Many researchers believe that we can now study the behaviour of children to see if they will grow up to be criminals while others disagree To what extent do you think crime is determined by genetics Is it possible to stop children from growing up to be cr 78
- Social media enable people to keep in touch with each other and learn about news events Do advantages outweigh disadvantages 83
- Nowadays the differences between countries are becoming less evident because we see the same TV shows advertisements fashion and follow the same brands To what extent the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...ses. People are benefitted by having an access to online media files because they are ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'watch the latest'.
Suggestion: watch the latest
... pay any significant amount of money to watch latest blockbusters or listen to their favouri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 275, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun try seems to be countable; consider using: 'many tries'.
Suggestion: many tries
...e balancesheet of companies; therefore, many try to find ways to stop this loss.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, such as, in most cases, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19252873563 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86854015 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591954022989 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3572766935 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.388888889 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.94444444444 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256014072422 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785684236721 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579795638319 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14649646731 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327811441858 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.