For centuries, important parts of education have remained such as reading, writing, and maths. With the advent of computers, some people think that computer skill be made as a fourth skill to be added to the list.
To what extent do you agree?
Opinions diverge on whether computer skills should be added to the curriculum at school which is currently occupied by reading, writing and maths. Although some formidably censure this sentiment, I am at loggerheads owing to some rational reasons.
Admittedly, students can take advantage of computer skills to assist their study. It is perceptible that there are a handful of reference resources available on the internet that students can simply access if they are skillful at computers. There are myriad platforms, for example, videos on youtube or social media as well as online libraries offering information for distinct subjects from the sciences to the arts. Moreover, particularly in pandemic, computer skills support the remote learning process. This emerges as the only one solution salvaging students from education interruption. Hence, using computers fluently gives students a helping hand in absorbing knowledge.
Further and even more prominently, being adept at computer skills provides students numerous profits in their future career paths. In this day and age, most business activities are dominated by technologies, which aid employees finishing their tasks faster and more accurately. The result of this practice is higher productivity at work. Therefore, recruiters seem to bias towards those with computer competency in light of saving time and money spent on training. Obviously, IT accomplished candidates can achieve highly remunerative salaries as well as promotion opportunities. As a result, computer experience is of paramount importance to subsequent career development.
By way of conclusion, apart from maths, reading and writing, schools should attach computer sciences to the present curriculum as a compulsory subject.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-18 | kevann | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | Mr.Strange | 92 | view |
- The graphs show changes in the trends of the urban and rural population and by different age groups from 1950 to 2040 67
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 78
- The chart below shows the percentages of males and females with higher education qualifications in 5 countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'handfuls', 'handsful'?
Suggestion: handfuls; handsful
...udy. It is perceptible that there are a handful of reference resources available on the...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndidates can achieve highly remunerative salaries as well as promotion opportunit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, apart from, as to, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76538461538 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01006939313 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673076923077 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3175962852 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9333333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218663813879 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680789680783 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546109593547 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124057932402 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379735714132 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.89 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.