These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work. What could be the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development?
Nowadays, more and more mothers shoulder the financial responsibilities of their family while their husbands look after children at home. While there exist some compelling reasons behind this trend, I, for one, think that it is rather a positive phenomenon.
To begin with, there are some convincing reasons why the role of fathers and mothers has undergone a change. First and foremost, women are not as conformist as they used to be in the past. Simply put, neither their husbands nor the social conventions can force them to stay at home anymore. In fact, the prevailing view that would see mothers only the housekeepers of the family is now completely obsolete. Second, many women now have the tendency to become financially independent. Here, men would be left with no alternative but to stay home taking care of children. Thus, seeing more women at the workplace instead of looking after their children is now widespread.
Admittedly, I firmly believe that this paradigm shift is a positive development. Although many would contend that mothers are the ones who their children need the most and their presence are by no means negligible, however, fathers are not less qualified. Firstly, in many cases, women are able to make more money than do men. This could happen due to women’s more qualifications needed in the job market. Second, many fathers now opt for working remotely or running their own business from home which is ubiquitous. In this case, they can readily both work on their business and watch children. As a result, this development can be of great value for the financial aspect of the family.
In conclusion, it has been recently a prevalent view that mothers can be the breadwinner while their husbands do not leave the house to have a job, instead, they are responsible for their offsprings. And there are many benefits accruing from this modern life development.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-01-06 | surajgupta1993 | 78 | view |
2021-12-03 | surajgupta1993 | 67 | view |
2021-12-03 | surajgupta1993 | 73 | view |
2021-11-18 | mahyarr | 67 | view |
- Nowadays many people drive to work or school instead of walking cycling or using public transport Does this trend have more advantages or more disadvantages 83
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate online without face to face contact Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this given statement 89
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, so, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in many cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00316455696 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71239824327 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560126582278 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5727449208 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382306966803 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108180769657 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609267229658 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235886155963 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600395542485 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.