The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart provides information about major reasons why men and women employees prefer to work remotely in 2019, and the table illustrates the working hour of employees by gender.
Overall, the most important reason for both groups was saving money which had been said by nearly half of the both groups. Moreover, males had more long working hours (over 30), whereas females had more short hours.
To begin with, the number of men and women, that their most important reason to stay home was saving money, had almost similar number with 45% for men and 42% for women. Furthermore, the least concerning reason for females was being productive with 11% and 24% for men, whereas childcare is accounted for the least concerning reason for men with only 4% and 28% women.
Regarding of working hours, as it is obvious from table, majority of women had limited working hours (under 10) compared to men which only 3% of them had under 10 working hours, and this pattern had been reversed for men. To elaborate more, 81% of men had over 30 hours working, while just 6% of women had over 30 working hours.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-15 | Trịnh Trí Dũng | 89 | view |
- Most people these days prefer getting news online to reading newspaper or watching TV Do you think it is a positive development 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of 6 years 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the samepark today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, regarding, so, whereas, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74611398964 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21055968845 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564766839378 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.6459310389 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.857142857 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 5.23603664747 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180088129349 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946470172927 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371600213296 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119623166162 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022716954385 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.