The following line graph shows the percentage of two modes of traveling in Vancouver from 1990 to 2015. Summarize the information by reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the percentage of using two different means of transportation in Vancouver between 1990 and 2015.
Overall, the percentage of traveling by car had a dramatic increase while the figure for commuting by bus significantly declined over the period.
Based on the statistics, traveling by car stood at roughly 25% in 1990, whereas almost 65% of Vancouver’s population considered commuting by bus. Over the next ten years, these numbers had drastic changes and ultimately met in the year 2000, when the trend for taking the bus went down gradually to approximately 45%.In contrast, the figure for traveling by car witnessed a significant growth to the same amount as the other trend simultaneously.
To draw a comparison, the figure for traveling by car had a steady rise to reach the highest point with 80% in 2015. In contrast, the percentage of people who took a bus noticeably dropped to nearly 30% at the end of the given period
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-30 | dinhphuonglinh | 59 | view |
- More companies have open working areas without walls and barriers in their desks Do the disadvantages of open plan offices outweigh the advantages 55
- The map below is the town of Garlsdon A new supermarket S is planned for the town The map shows two possible sites for the supermarkets Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The following line graph shows the percentage of two modes of traveling in Vancouver from 1990 to 2015 Summarize the information by reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 318, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ent down gradually to approximately 45%.In contrast, the figure for traveling by c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00625 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00259653259 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60625 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9993589712 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158641340458 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935036022241 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851931482357 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120062982181 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896822571397 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.