Throughout history, human beings have sometimes made mistakes in their life. Similarly, teachers and lecturers make some mistakes during their teachings. In this regard, there is a controversy among people on how to react toward teachers' mistakes. There are different approaches such as forgetting about the mistake, correcting the mistake immediately, and rectifying the mistake after the session. I believe that the third approach is the best way to correct an erroneous statement and I will elaborate on my viewpoint in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, interrupting the teacher is disruptive behavior. Teachers probably lose their concentration when they are interrupted and they may be not able to continue their speech. Thus, the session can be impractical due to the teacher's distraction. In addition, other students in the class may be distracted by this disruptive behavior and they may not be able to focus on their lesson as well. Take a personal experience as an example: last semester I had a class in which a student asked lots of questions and interrupted our teacher. Trying to answer the so-called student's questions, our teacher had difficulties getting back to the main topic of the session, and this phenomenon made the class efficiency decline dramatically. Regarding this example, people should avoid interrupting others.
Secondly, as we all know, it is inevitable to make some mistakes. No one can claim that he or she never makes mistakes. It is not embarrassing to make mistakes, but it is substantial to try to avoid repeating mistakes. Given that teachers are human beings, they may say some wrong statements in their class. Thus, students should inform them of their mistakes so that they can be aware of them and do not repeat their mistakes in other classes. But, students should respect their teachers and try not to hurt their teacher's reputation. Therefore, the best way to tell the teachers their mistakes is saying after class. In this way, Teachers understand their mistakes and they can maintain their reputation as well.
All in all, taking into account what was already mentioned, I believe that telling teachers their mistakes after class not only makes them aware of their faults but also helps them maintain their reputation.
- Should the government sell Amtrak and let a private company run it instead The answer is no First losing money due to underused routes people who complain about this fail to understand that the main purpose of Amtrak is not to make a profit but to provide 81
- TPO 43 Independent Writing TaskImagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wai 70
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea 65
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement After completing high school students should take at least a year off to work or travel before they begin studying at a university Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Which one of the following values is the most important to share with a young child 5 10 years old 1 Being helpful 2 Being honest 3 Being well organized 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...e session can be impractical due to the teachers distraction. In addition, other student...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, third, thus, well, as for, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18157181572 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8231121179 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514905149051 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7488048659 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0476190476 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52380952381 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 3.85842293907 415% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113768501987 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451213664583 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330083461674 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0762508877258 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285924721056 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.