In any society, educational system is of high importance and teachers, as a noticeable elemant in the development of education, should be considered and valued. With this in mind, some people contend that nowadays, in comparison to the past, teachers are not cherished as much as they deserve. I do believe that this statement is true and I will elaborate on my viewpoint in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, we live in an era in wich technology and sience are flourishing at a galloping rate, and as a result, lots of platforms has been created that students can use to gain information. Conversely, In the past, internet was not developed in large scale and people had no-or at best restricted- access to internet and data. Thus, teachers were the only resource for students to gain knowledge and they played a crucial role in the success of students. Keeping this in mind, students felt they owed to their teachers for sharing information with them. To clarify, nowadays a great number of students think that classes are dispensable and they are reluctant to attend the class since they think they can learn by downloading tutrial videos or watching online class. Hence, they do not respect their teachers and appreciate them very much.
Furthermore, as we all know, in this hectic era, money can be an indicator of a person's prosperity and importance. If people assume that teaching is a hard job and has a profound impact on the progress of society, they should ask the government to increase teachers' income. But, in contrast with the past, nowadays teachers' income is classified in the lowest incomes and they are deprived of welfare. So, how individuals can claim that they appreciate teachers while they are ignorant about the welfare of teachers?
To sum up, taking into account what was already mentioned, I contend that teachers nowadays are less appreciated not only because they lack sufficient income but also as a result of enormous information available on the interent that make their proffesion less important.
- Should the government sell Amtrak and let a private company run it instead The answer is no First losing money due to underused routes people who complain about this fail to understand that the main purpose of Amtrak is not to make a profit but to provide 81
- TOEFL T P O 43 Integrated Writing Task 3
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by the society in the past than today 76
- TOEFL T P O 43 Integrated Writing Task 3
- Plain of jars TPO 59 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...tic era, money can be an indicator of a persons prosperity and importance. If people as...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ciety, they should ask the government to increase teachers income. But, in contra...
^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dividuals can claim that they appreciate teachers while they are ignorant about t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, furthermore, hence, if, so, thus, while, in contrast, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98826979472 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78438605503 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565982404692 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0695434738 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134064150457 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529692716123 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047385372876 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083403979279 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274698740178 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.