The given maps show the evolution of a normal fishing village to become a big tourist resort with European style.
Overall, there were numerous significant change along with the growth of the poppulation such as the disappearence of the sheeps and goats area.
It is obvious that the sheeps and goats land has been removed as well as the olives, its area in 2004 was farmland which almost provided fruit and vegs for hotels. Furthermore, the village nearby was expanded and consisted of many tourist shops, the woodland has been developed into the golf course. The village to the north-east was the only one remained unchaged in the northside of the map.
Move to the south, the original village still there, it haven't been touched, but the boats and the harbour were not the same, they have been all knocked-down to made place for the beaches for the tourism. Along the main road, there are considerable number of buildings were built due to the exploison of the poppulation from 50000 in 1974 to 80000 in 2004.
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 73
- Smoking is a major cause of serious illness and death throughout the world today In the interest of the public health governments should ban cigarettes and other tobacco products Do you agree or disagree 56
- The line graph shows Paris Metro station passengers Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...h, the original village still there, it havent been touched, but the boats and the har...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, still, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82954545455 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45872434673 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619318181818 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0571552043 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.428571429 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166926756143 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773170030709 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716238828339 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104183170087 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848200242245 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.