The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company.
"As other companies have recently stated that their employees take the Easy Read Speed Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One graduate of the course was able to read a 500 page report in only two hours; another graduate rose from an assistant manager to vice president of the company in under a year. Obviously, the faster you can read, the more information you can absorb in a single workday. Moreover, Easy Read would cost acme only $500 per employee-a small price to pay when you consider the benefits. Included in this fee is a three-week seminar in Spruce City and a lifelong subscription to the Easy Read newsletter. Clearly, to improve productivity, Acme should require all of our employees to take the Easy Read course."
The argument states that to improve productivity, acme should require all of his graduates to take easy read course. To validate this argument certain facts are provided like increase in reading speed of one graduate, promotion of one graduate from assistant manager to vice president. But, the conclusion is based on vague statements that lend a little support to the conclusion. The argument contains many flaws.
First of all, argument states that increase in reading speed leads to more productivity. But only one parameter of increase in reading speed is considered for increase in productivity. There might be other reasons also for increase in productivity.
Secondly, argument states that one graduate can read 500 pages report in two hours. But, it does not provide any data for other graduates ability. This argument applies the ability of one person to represent a large number of graduates. His ability to read fast might be due to his good command over the language, his high IQ. Individual differences also play important role in determining an individuals ability.
Further, argument states that faster one reads more information he can absorb in a single workday. But, fast reading does not ensure that reader must absorb the information he is reading. It might be possible that fast reading reduces the intake of knowledge.
So, the conclusion is based on fallacious evidences which lend to small buttress to conclusion. The argument might be more convincing if some data is provided for increase in productivity due to fast reading, data of more graduates is given. Then argument may be more promising.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2012-11-14 | iqbal244340 | 60 | view |
- Neighbors are the people who live near us. In your opinion ,what are the qualities of a good neighbor? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 67
- The following appeard in a helth newsletter."A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that number i 53
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Parkville Daily newspaper."Throughout the country last year,as more and more children below the age of nine participated in youth league sports , over 40,000 of these young players suffered injuries. 55
- In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge. 60
- "Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future." 60
flaws:
No. of Words: 263 350
No. of Different Words: 132 200
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.611 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.24 7.5
Try to remove those flaws to improve. You have the same flaws in your essays.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 263 350
No. of Characters: 1325 1500
No. of Different Words: 132 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.027 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.038 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.7 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 98 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 58 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.611 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.24 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.611 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.341 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.574 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.124 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5