Government should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organization. Do you think it is positive or negative development?
To control the research becomes more independent and accessible, I believe that the government should responsible for funding all research expenses instead of private sector. However, the bureaucracy still becomes the cliche problem.
Researchers usually attempt to get money from private company because of the better income, but they have a tendency to manipulate the data to adjust with the funding expectations. For example, Indonesia Survey Agency, one of the most popular survey institution in Indonesia, usually made a survey to find the desire of voters before participate in election. They are often hired by one of the candidate, and the survey becomes in favor of the one. In addition, the research funded by private, usually non accessible for all people. The result is completely becomes the organization's property. For example, the artificial intelligence funded by Google is categorized as confidential technology. It could be dangerous if the company try to hijack or rebel to the state by its technology.
On the other hand, the main problem when the government handle all research fund, is the bureaucracy. Research is different compare to buying products, tickets or staying in the hotel, it could be arranged in the planning of the year and its proof that can be reimbursed, but for the research the reverse. The researchers usually spend a lot of money without proof, they have a tendency to pay for the interviewer, buy the paper or pay the security to get the real data.For example, in Indonesian Science Agency (LIPl), the researchers have to give the travel documents and the taxi billing to get their money back while they do not have its documents.
In conclusion, I believe that funding and controlling the research should be the government responsibility, since it is independent and accessible. Where possible, the government should make a regulation to reduce the bureaucracy requirements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-24 | Ahmad Gelora Mahardika | 73 | view |
- In many societies in the world the population is ageing rapidly and this is leading to an unsustainable increase in the cost of public healthcare A nation s population should pay for their healthcare provision in the future 73
- What distinguishes young people from their parents or grandparents generation is a lack of physical exercise Today s generation are spending far too long playing computer games chatting aimlessly on social networking sites or simply watching TV and too li 73
- The line chart below shows the results of a survey giving the reasons why people moved to the capital city of a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The Oxford AstraZeneca Vaccine has probably saved more live than other 56
- Some people feel that the legal age at which people can marry should be at least 21 To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 571, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organizations'' or 'organization's'?
Suggestion: organizations'; organization's
...e. The result is completely becomes the organizations property. For example, the artificial i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...r pay the security to get the real data.For example, in Indonesian Science Agency L...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, still, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25974025974 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.033892432 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.6980879214 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279655031397 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989034185908 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850555679946 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191870825836 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494582949098 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.