The reading and the lceture are both contradicting each other, in terms of forest fired that occured in Yellowstone in 1988. More specifically, the penman of the article mentiones that forest fire in yellow stone was massive and damaged tramendeously to land of the fores due to the policy of "let it burn". Accordingly, she proposed three thoeries in support of change in policy in the Yellowstone forest. However, the lecturer negates these arguments presented in the passage and provides some evidence to refute them.
According to the article, the first dispute focuses on the fact that in 1988, fire in yellowstone produced devasted effect on the land, and extensive amount of plants and vegetation died due to that. Nonetheless, the speaker negates this by stating that massive phase of Yellowstone had strikling outcomes in the upcoming years. In fact, it allowed small plant to grow in a open land of forest and seeds which needed high sunlight was able to florished in the land. Therefore, the previous destructive episode enhanced diversity in the land of yellowstone.
Moreover, another point of debate heighlights that many animal was not able to survived in the fire and it which lead to change in the food chains among animals. Neverethless, the lecturer rebutes by asserting that as a matter of the food chain became stronger than earlier since certain small animals life rabit got an opportunity to live in without the fear of wild animals. Hence, it helped to recover the population growth in the forest similary the way vegetation came back to normal.
Finally, yet importantly, the last text explains that many tourists relunctant to visit the national park, and thereby, the local economy went down drastically. On the contrary, the professor undermines the point and describes that fire was occured due to combining factors worked together at that time such as strong wind with rain fall, however, it never appeared again afterthat. On top of that visitors also started visitng place in the very next year. Therefore, there is no need to change the policy in the forest.
- If your friend wants to reduce living expenses which one would you suggest 1 Find a roommate that can share the living expenses 2 Buy the new technology products cell phone less frequently 3 Shop for less expensive food and cook at home instead of eating 73
- Do you agree or disagree Internet should be like other services such as roads and government should provide it to the public with no cost 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own 90
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is Thus the projec 3
- the government should taxing unhealthy food because this can discourage people to reduce their consuming and to used this taxes for something beneficial agree or disagree 90
No. of Words: 347 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 10 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 18 2
No. of Sentences: 15 12
No. of Words: 347 250
No. of Characters: 1704 1200
No. of Different Words: 201 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.316 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.911 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.597 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 125 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 96 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.133 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.374 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.33 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.541 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.076 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4