Summarize the points made in the lecture,
being sure to explain how they cast doubt
on the specific points made in the reading
passage about Text Speak
The article and the lecturer more deals with whether Text Speak is advantageous or not for children. Whilst the author feels that it is not very good habit for children for three specific reasons. The lecturer disavows his points and say that this passage's claims are not convincing and rejects all claims made by the author.
First of all, the author states that children will not take the time to learn new words when they are practiced to Text speak. He also adds it advantage by saying that, It is a good habit for children and will promote creativity, thoughtfulness, and many more. On contrary lecturer says that there were times when messages were limited to 100 SMS per day and many restrictions. So Text speak was an effective way for texting others. The lecturer adds on to that by saying that it is just a special type of language.
Secondly, the author highlights that in formal writing children may use these acronyms which is not advised. He also asserts that children who communicate via text speak are more likely to make errors and they are practiced to use non-words which is due to lack of exposure. However, the lecturer brings this point into argument by saying that the purpose of this is to give more exposure moreover, children are reading and writing rather than just speaking which a good thing.
Finally, In the article the author claims that if children are prone to such languages for a long time, they might be more spelling errors in native English. He also asserts that the level of literacy may reduce and also, understanding of literacy, top class works of literature may be reduced. However, the lecturer argues that it's not a different language that most messages are written in. He also holds that, they are just new words that are added and these are words which developed along time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-02 | deepak krishnamurthy | 80 | view |
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavant 84
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage about deforestation 3
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people marry shortly after finishing college Others prefer to focus on their careers first and wait until later to get married Which of these situations do you think is better 77
- The graph shows the percentage of males and females academic staff members across the faculties of a major university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'advantages'?
Suggestion: advantages
...racticed to Text speak. He also adds it advantage by saying that, It is a good habit for ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 488, Rule ID: ALONG_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'a long time'?
Suggestion: a long time
...ded and these are words which developed along time.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.4613686534 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 12.0772626932 190% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74213836478 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41043838411 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51572327044 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9774530551 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.533333333 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174815953529 0.272083759551 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606164550067 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504137883435 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112084435452 0.162205337803 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442908919994 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.