Today, youngsters make up about 40% of the world's population. Some people believe that children over 15 should have the ability to vote. I'm afraid I have to disagree. I believe that citizens over 18 should only vote. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, people between 18 and 15 are still children, and they cannot think rationally. In many countries, this category in society does not have an identification card or a driving license because they are still minors and cannot think logically. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was 16 years old, I took my father's car and drove in the neighborhood without my father's permission. I was a minor and could not think reasonably, even though I knew I did not have a driving license. So, children over the age of 15 and below 18 cannot vote because of the lacking reasonable thinking and ability to make proper decisions.
Furthermore, the candidates will manipulate this age category easily. Children above 15 and below 18 are not mature, so that candidates can affect their choices. The majority of these youngsters do not have political views, so that they can be affected easily by the candidates. For instance, the United States Congress did not approve of lowering the voting age because, according to the politicians, the children are not ready enough to vote. They cannot decide by themselves without others' involvement. I believe that children above are not capable of forming political views and understanding their society's needs.
In conclusion, I strongly feel that children above 15 and below 18 should not be allowed to vote. This is because they are under the age of legal responsibility and cannot think logically. Moreover, the candidates can affect them easily.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world Use reasons and details to support your opinion 60
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum, was first detected in the forests of the western United States. P. ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees: in many infected oaks, leaves wither rap 81
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples t 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ay, youngsters make up about 40% of the worlds population. Some people believe that ch...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...ver 15 should have the ability to vote. Im afraid I have to disagree. I believe th...
^^
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'vote' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'votes'.
Suggestion: votes
... over the age of 15 and below 18 cannot vote because of the lacking reasonable think...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97704918033 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79300389074 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508196721311 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4658638694 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.9 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.25 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212075619005 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650363659926 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728294133885 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139926681462 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240766052131 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.