People behavior and ways of life vary (greetings, table manner and clothing) from country to country. It is sometimes said that when people are visiting another country, for example on business or for a holiday, they should behave in the same way as the inhabitants of that country. Do you agree or disagree?
Today, the travel industry has contributed to global connectivity. Further, travel on business or for a holiday is a necessity for most professionals working in international firms. This essay completely agrees with the statement that people should behave and change the way of greeting locals or table mannerism when in other country. The changes in behavior during a visit can both be satisfying and bonding experience for everybody and will be discussed further in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, adopting to the new cultural requirement of another country can be rewarding. It is a wonderful opportunity to try and understand the cultural differences and appreciate the fashion sense or manners of people in other country. For example, when an American visits India and tries to eat local dishes such as “Dosa” with their hand, the experience may be satisfying. Further, the experience of eating by hand is new learning experience. Hence, it is beneficial to be a roman in Rome.
Secondly, it is important to connect with other nationals by greeting used locally for understanding of their culture. Learning by experience is the key to taking home elements of the place. If a Canadian learn to use “Namaste” or “Jai Sri Krishna” from in travel to India for instance instead of using “Hi” or “Hello” to greet, it can be wonderful way to connect with the Indian community when they get back from India to Canada. This can improve understanding of Indians in Canada.
In conclusion, people change the way of life when they are visiting other country and is beneficial to do it when they visit on business or on holiday. In my opinion, I completely agree with it as there is no harm to change your greeting words or way of eating for complete understanding of local way of life in another country. It is not harmful to behave as the inhabitants of the country but can teach people a good way to live in harmony.
- Some believe that technology such as mobile phones cell phones are destroying social interaction Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people say that it is important for everyone to do something creative in their free time Others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The users of social media such as Facebook Twitter are replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages of this way outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The table and chart give information on pilots in 3 years Summarize information report main feature and compare relevant information 73
- Children s friends are an important part of their lives What kinds of influence may children s friends have on them What is the best way for parents to make sure that their children s friends are a good influence on them 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 385, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ges in behavior during a visit can both be satisfying and bonding experience for everybody an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 121, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...rding. It is a wonderful opportunity to try and understand the cultural differences and...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 361, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...sa” with their hand, the experience may be satisfying. Further, the experience of eating by h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93577981651 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95864882302 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501529051988 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.215621238 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364814842643 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108309306439 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108819227307 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229460601248 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134681110392 0.056905535591 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.