Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development

A number of universities suggest that classes through online platforms as a substitute for traditional classes. In my opinion, this trend can have both beneficial and detrimental impacts in equal measure. On the one hand, several benefits of distance learning programmers should be taken into account. Firstly, students can save time to travel to school and back. As a result, they can spend time for other purposes such as sleep, doing their homework, and helping their parents to do household chores. Secondly, online courses can help universities to cut down on their expenses. For example, because schools do not need to invest in facilities as well as building infrastructure, which means that schools can deduct more money into student scholarships. On the other hand, the drawback of this trend should not be ignored. The problem is that students can be distracted by the surrounding environment like replying to their friend’s messages, joining in and out of social networking sites, and responding to their parents. Consequently, they can not attention to their lessons, which is leads to reducing the effectiveness of the learning process. In addition, lacking face-to-face interaction can be a big problem. For instance, when professors give students a group assignment, they will not discuss it just through messages or emails. As a result, students can miss information when all members in a group chat with a lot of people in there. In conclusion, I believe that traditional or modern platform classes can have both positive and negative effects depending on individual students.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29133858268 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99973132076 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606299212598 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8998746865 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7857142857 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0978308893924 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374807269052 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473969540467 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978308893924 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.