Recklessness of people in regard to environment has highlighted the risk of making the earth a worse place to live. It is stated that issues related to atmosphere can only be tackled if current generation try to live simply to save their coming generation. I disagree with the statement and I will articulate my befitting disagreement in following paragraph prior to reaching conclusion.
It is noteworthy to mention that comfortable living standard of dwellers contributing immensely to worsen the conditions of living and forest areas. However this growing distressing situation can be solved if people and government teamed up. The most worthmentioning solution is that preparedness towards the leaving unhealthy habits by individuals which includes stopping themselves from throwing garbage here and there and limitation on the daily necessities. For example, in Canada, citizens consider their responsibility to maintain hygiene in order to preserve environment. Resultantly, instead of giving up good lifestyle, individuals need to change their harming habits.
In addition to this, governments can similarly protect atmosphere as citizens do with more credible steps launcment of awareness programs and creation of environment saving boards and teams would work as a miracle for guiding people regarding environmental problems. For instance, in America, in 1995, government fixed special funds to save environment and still that scheme running smoothly. Hence, guidelines on the behalf of governments to dwellers about how to save atmosphere would prove tremendously beneficial.
After doing discussion on total disagreement it can be concluded that individuals are not only those who linked with environmental issues but also governments are. Combine efforts of both can solve the prevailing problems sooner than one handed approaches and the results could be expected more certain.
- In the past important knowledge of culture and history was stored in museum Nowadays information is freely available on internet therefore is no longer need for museum To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Scientists believe that in order to protect the environment people must use less energy in their daily lives However most people have not changed the way they live Why do you think many people have not taken individual action What could be done to encoura 59
- the bar chart shows the percentage of elderly citizens in three countries in 1980 2000 2030 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Most people do not care enough about environmental issues To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 79
- The amount of time spend on sport and exercise should be increased in school in order to tackle the problem of overweight children Do you think this the best way to deal with the problem What other solutions can you suggest 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... conditions of living and forest areas. However this growing distressing situation can ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y protect atmosphere as citizens do with more credible steps launcment of awarene...
^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on the behalf of governments to dwellers about how to save atmosphere would prove...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, regarding, similarly, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73758865248 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16327163078 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8492483505 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.461538462 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145654838826 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471266809769 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341579686707 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809361274128 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182420324082 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.