The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This bar chart illustrates the numbers (in thousands) of students who chose a certain university with eight subjects (Sciences, Mathematics, Social Sciences, Languages, Humanities, The Arts, Literature, Law) in 2005.
Overall, the chart groups students according to subjects and divides these subjects groups into a male and female categories. There here are some foolproof differences on subjects chosen between the two genders.
Around 24, 000 female chose social sciences higher than the males at about 14, 000. Moreover, social science is also the subject with the highest total number of choices compared to other subjects. There were approximately 18, 000 girls and 2, 000 boys in Languages, making it the least popular subject overall (2, 000). The number of boys enrolled in sciences was over 20, 000, which was roughly twice as many as the number of females at around 10,000. As for Mathematics, females stood at 4, 000, which was nowhere near as close as males with 18, 000.
On the other hand, the remaining subjects for both genders were not as popular, Humanities, The Arts, Literature, Law. 15, 000 males chose literature, compared to 12, 000 females. In Humanities, the net figure was the same for both sexes at 12, 000 each. Arts were mostly dominated by females with 9, 000 vs 3, 000 (males), whereas the law was dominated by males with 10, 000 vs 6000 (females).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-24 | lythidieuhienb2101276 | view | |
| 2022-03-10 | phungthianhthu | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-10 | ngochuclang | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-10 | Lanquyen1806 | 89 | view |
| 2016-12-14 | Vermouth Truong | 67 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, whereas, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 26.3917525773 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 937.175257732 122% => OK
No of words: 230.0 206.0 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98260869565 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60215121126 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 127.690721649 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552173913043 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 290.88556701 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6804123711 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7204630583 44.8134815571 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 76.5299724578 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 16.8248392259 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 4.34317383033 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124203120484 0.216113520407 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559923809488 0.0766984524023 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706725214831 0.0603063233224 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114185578395 0.12726935374 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938011418767 0.0580467560999 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 8.37731958763 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 70.7449484536 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 8.71597938144 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 7.59969072165 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 41.2886597938 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.