Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
Considering the current state of affairs in the world, many can surmise that human mental health is paramount in our day-to-day lives. However, the impact of the world-changing process has been a contentious and touchy subject. One viewpoint emphasizes that nowadays, people are less happy due to the world rapid changing, while others contend that they are entirely cheerful with their lives. Despite the vast array of views on the issue, I count myself among the proponent of the former idea, and I concur with that. I will delve into some reasons to substantiate my response in the following.
The first and foremost reason that deserves some words is that needless to say, the technology development, in particular social media affect on human's life profusely. In my view, these phenomena lead to two vital effects that make people less happy and satisfied with their lives than people in the past, when there was no technology as same as nowadays. At first, technology makes people to be less social, owing to the fact that it forces them to communicate merely with each other by social media. In past, people tend to meet their relatives and friends physically. However, nowadays, they attempt to have relationships with their friends on chat or video calls. This restriction and not communicating with people lead to affect on life satisfaction so that people feel alone, though they pretend that they are not. One of my friends, who was a blogger and had so many friends on social media, always suffered from her loneliness due to the fact that they were not impersonate as a real friend. Even though the reasoning and explanation above provides ample substantiation for my stance on the matter, there is yet another equally important reason to be mentioned. The second compelling reason is that people spend ample time on social media; they start to compare themselves with other people who represent that they have high lifestyle quality. In the following, the people satisfaction's levels will decrease extremely. An investigation has done on this issue in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), showed that the rate of suicide expanded during these years on account of the deceiving feature of social media. In addition, the investigation has reported one of the influential factors on this issue is diminishing young people incentive caused by world-changing.
In summary, I can safely conclude that nowadays, people are less happy with their lives. One of the most crucial reasons is technology development. This is because not only does it makes people alone, but also it declines human satisfaction due to the gigantic comparison with others' lifestyles. Thus, I suggest governments hold some workshops to inform people about these consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 75 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | farjam | 60 | view |
- Ansel adams photographs 80
- Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 90
- Broccoli cultivation 85
- It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own 90
- in many places students must arrive very early in the morning to attend school Some people believe that starting the school day early is the best approach to support learning but others believe that starting the school day at a later time in the morning w 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...development, in particular social media affect on humans life profusely. In my view, thes...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...t, in particular social media affect on humans life profusely. In my view, these pheno...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 502, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...merely with each other by social media. In past, people tend to meet their relatives an...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 727, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...d not communicating with people lead to affect on life satisfaction so that people feel a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 970, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'impersonated'.
Suggestion: impersonated
...ness due to the fact that they were not impersonate as a real friend. Even though the reaso...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'make'?
Suggestion: make
...pment. This is because not only does it makes people alone, but also it declines huma...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'make'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: make
...pment. This is because not only does it makes people alone, but also it declines huma...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, thus, while, in addition, in particular, in summary, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2309.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13111111111 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79136676112 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 718.2 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8548147516 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.952380952 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04761904762 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355512051739 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101163082184 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101016326537 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238610849075 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043186969788 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.