Nowadays, with the hectic society, gaining an education is the utmost important part of human life, because it will ensure our future life. After obtaining higher knowledge, everyone has a hard time choosing a career. Some people choose to follow their parents' path, while others pursue their interests. I disagree with the statement and I feel this way for the following reasons.
First of all, everyone has different interests, because having the same attributes as our parents does not mean that we need to have similar things to enjoy. My experience is a compelling example of this. When I was in my senior year of high school, I have already chosen my major to be engineer because I loved to solve mathematics and physics problems. But, when I told it my parents, they were surprised that I did not want to become an economist like them. At the time, the main problem was that both I and my parents had different notions of the path I have chosen. As a result, they were disappointed in me for a while. So, I think parents should respect their children's opinions.
Secondly, it is our life, not our parents'. If we choose our career just because for the reason that it will disappoint our parents, it is not a great choice. Needless to say, no one wants to waste their time on invaluable things. If the job we chose turned out to be boring and ineffective, it will affect the productivity of work. For instance, my cousin wanted to be a lawyer. But she became a doctor because of her parents' demand and she is doing a great job. However, she is not happy, because she always feels like she is being forced to do something. Therefore, after working as a doctor for a quiet time, she realized that it was a waste of time. Afterward, she pursued the path that she was desiring.
In conclusion, even though it is important to carry our parents' legacy, we should choose our career based on the things we like, not including the parents' decision. It is important because it is our life and we should enjoy it as much as we can.
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects What is specific to these online encyclopedias how 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents job than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents job Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 66
- About a project that uses a device to grow more tress in order to prevent desertification 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- The little ice age was a period of unusually cold temperature in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900CE There were unusually harsh winters and glaciers grew larger in many areas Scientist have long wondered what caused t 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is not a great choice. Needless to say, no one wants to waste their time on inva...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54495912807 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52491391004 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528610354223 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 12.0 3.51792114695 341% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4734215486 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.8181818182 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6818181818 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199014960959 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059045425067 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594680572939 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117914078503 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480523054052 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.