Some people claim that a nation’s government should preserve its wildness area in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain
There is no doubt in this fact that wildness areas have played a prevailing role in our ecosystem. In this regard, there is a long-standing discussion among academicians about whether nowadays nation’s government has more attention on maintenance wildness areas than they had in the past or not. In this way, although many people are the leading proponents of the claim that the governments should grab wildness area in their natural state for economic capability, I firmly believe that wildness areas should be preserved against development whenever possible. Among many reasons why I hold this opinion, two stand out and will be discussed later in this essay.
The first thing that juts out of mind easily at the first moment of thinking about it is the fact that we as a human have a heavy duty to preserve earth’s ecosystem for future generation to ensure the sustainability of development, harmonious with our surrounding environment and rich culture. In other words, wildness areas should be preserved untouched and kept as restricted as possible because our children have the right to use them. Excessive groundwater withdrawal for human use is a clear-cut example for this issue, so this problem may cause drought periods in the next years.
The second reason that is worth considering is the fact that from my view of point, every change that we implement on our ecosystem leads to unexpected disasters in our nature finally. In this regard, we must have an important goal about preserving nature and that is protecting significant natural features including special geological formations, rare plant communities, and critical wildlife habitats. Global warming is the excellent example for this claim, so this event leads to a higher temperature on earth that may be origin of many disasters for us.
To wrap it up, based on the aforementioned arguments, there are many reasons which can be persuasive enough in order to protect and manage natural resources and lands. Some of these reasons are mentioned above such as thinking about next generations and disaster occurring possibility. But that was just a shot out of the cannon. Obviously, there are many other reasons and examples, challenging the claim, which are not mentioned above. All in all, wildness areas should be preserved and protected as areas of natural beauty and as such should not be zoned for development.
- The following appeared in a letter to the school board in the town of Centerville. "All students should be required to take the driver's education course at Centerville High School. In the past two years, several accidents in and around Centerville have i 50
- College and university education should be free for all students, fully financed by the government 27
- Teachers’ salaries should be based on academic performance of their students 20
- Some people claim that a nation’s government should preserve its wildness area in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain 50
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large, highly diversified company. "Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions. The buildings were erected by different constructi 50
flaws:
Need to argue why 'these areas should not be developed for potential economic gain'
You should not use those pattern sentences in GRE.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 390 350
No. of Characters: 1959 1500
No. of Different Words: 214 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.444 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.023 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.765 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 132 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 106 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 81 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 58 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.695 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.533 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.324 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.545 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.113 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5