Some believe that technology, such as mobile phones, cell phones are destroying social interaction. Do you agree or disagree?
Many peoples think that technology is behind decrease of social meetings. Mobile phone is changing fast and new phone like smart phone can do everything. You can send email, make payment, do shopping, listening to song or even watching series. If so many things is possible then people can not remove the eyes from the phones. So, I agree that mobile phone is a big problem today and is the reason why people are not meeting and spending time.
People buying smart phones because he wants to use it for many things. There is no time waste like going to real bank and talking to make the payment. It is very easy to go to bank website and do it at home. Also, anybody can do shopping like on Amazon and get the items delivery. Food also can be ordered with out even talking. So people have less reason to talk to real person.
People also like to watch movies, web series and many things from their phone. Also there is no limit and people have option to watch drama, comedy or sports and it does not finish. If somebody like web series there is season 1, 2 and many more. So all age group people is spending too much time on mobile phone and they are become alone in life and happy in phones.
To conclude, mobile phone technology is good but the side effect of people living with themselves is true. So, I completely agree it is destroying all option to meet people
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-07 | s4990 | 56 | view |
| 2020-03-07 | singla_mba2007 | 89 | view |
- The table and chart give information on pilots in 3 years Summarize information report main feature and compare relevant information 73
- The chart below compares the responses of undergraduates and postgraduates to a questionnaire on their opinion about their university library Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- You want to send a gift present to you friend who has moved recently to a new home Write a letter to your friend In your letter Describe the gift Why you chose the gift Explain on how you plan to deliver the gift 64
- You have been renting an apartment in an English Speaking Country The landlord has been very helpful and friendly Now you are leaving and one of your friends would like to move into the apartment Write a letter to your landlord In your letter Explain when 84
- It is sometimes said that people should change career at least once in their life rather than doing the same kind of job all their working life Do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tening to song or even watching series. If so many things is possible then people ...
^^
Line 2, column 266, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'items'' or 'item's'?
Suggestion: items'; item's
... do shopping like on Amazon and get the items delivery. Food also can be ordered with...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...tems delivery. Food also can be ordered with out even talking. So people have less reaso...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...eries and many things from their phone. Also there is no limit and people have optio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38039215686 5.12529762239 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.08254864115 2.80592935109 74% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560784313725 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.9046277223 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.7058823529 106.682146367 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.35294117647 7.06120827912 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21795112316 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728202792792 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788056191703 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151019200414 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836605128199 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.7 13.0946893788 51% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 50.2224549098 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.53 12.4159519038 61% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.