Many animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea. What are the reasons and solutions to solve this issue?
There is an undeniable fact that actions taken by mankind are leading the majority of animals to the verge of extinction happening on both land and water. There are a number of reasons behind this phenomenon and several solutions should be adopted by not only governments but also individuals to improve the situation.
There are two primary reasons why more and more species are being made endangered, obviously, the blame is on the way humans are treating Earth, particularly land and sea. One reason is that as the demand for raw materials is increasingly increasing, deforestation and land erosion are inevitable consequences owing to the overly exploiting processes such as cutting down trees to collect wood or searching for natural resources underground. Furthermore, the irresponsibilities of many factories result in carelessly or even illegally dumping untreated industrial waste directly in the water, some cases are even fuels accidentally leaked through tankers while traveling on the sea.
Fortunately, several measures could be taken to prevent this troublesome problem. The first solution would be cutting down on unnecessary exploitation of materials and instead, governments should carry out more campaigns involving planting trees and assembling citizens on taking part in bettering the quality of surroundings, tougher punishment should be applied against harming the environment as well. A second measure would be in the hands of individuals. Each person should raise more awareness of their disposable waste and start normalizing green lifestyles such as following the 3Rs rule or minimizing energy use for the sake of their own and later generations' future.
In conclusion, it is clear that there are various reasons for the animal species being in danger. Apparently, human thoughtless actions are at fault, and steps need to be taken more seriously by the collaboration of citizens and the government to tackle this problem as soon as possible.
- 2 With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging such areas Surroundings 73
- With the increasing demand for energy sources such as oil and gas should people looking for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched places Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas 78
- The bar graph shows the number of people employed in different workplaces in one region of Australia in 2001 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 65
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...dividuals to improve the situation. There are two primary reasons why more and mo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...o collect wood or searching for natural resources underground. Furthermore, the irrespons...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47385620915 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07579539671 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614379084967 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.8235979424 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.272727273 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8181818182 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176398556215 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067301184866 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524744021365 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114406125486 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522784656722 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.