Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Getting advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting that from your peers.
Life is a long journey and people need advice to find the best choice. Who is the best person to get advice is always core to their experience and knowledge. Some people might think getting advice from friends who are the same age is convenient, but in my opinion, it is better to get advice from people who are older than me because of their previous experience and broader horizons.
To begin with, peers can talk to each other and try to find a good solution when they face similar situations. Unfortunately, the solution always lacks important information because peers are limited on their similar background, and they have not experienced a lot. By contrast, people older than us have already faced the same situation that we just faced, so they can share the method which they choses to deal with the problem.
Moreover, people older than us have a broader horizon which can solve the problem in an efficient way. For example, in college I majored in physics, so I have had a physics problem to solve. When I was trying to get the solution of the physics problem by analyzing the forces, my teacher told us it should be solved by analyzing energy. Therefore, people who have broadened horizons can analyze problems in different aspects which are practical and efficient.
In conclusion, when we have questions, we should get advice from people who are older than us instead of peers due to their broadened horizons and previous experiences. It can help us to solve problems in practical and efficient ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-12 | jimHsu | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-12 | jimHsu | 66 | view |
| 2022-05-18 | Trent | 60 | view |
| 2018-08-30 | yoonjung1917@gmail.com | 76 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | precious oseghale | 73 | view |
- Which one do you think is the most useful practice to improve our environment 1 walking or bicycling to reduce driving 2 only consuming organic food to reduce pesticides 3 reusing waters 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Getting advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting that from your peers 60
- If your city s government only has enough budget to fund ONE of the following projects which do you think the money should go to 1 play movies in parks often so that people can watch them for free 2 provide students with extra classes so that they can lea 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'cored'.
Suggestion: cored
...the best person to get advice is always core to their experience and knowledge. Some...
^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...der horizon which can solve the problem in an efficient way. For example, in college I majored in p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...blems in practical and efficient ways.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1977.66487455 64% => OK
No of words: 262.0 407.700716846 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80534351145 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58208575221 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 212.727598566 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503816793893 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 618.680645161 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7938466269 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.916666667 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223419046506 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084233535165 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936914330606 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15288551017 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881697690523 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 86.8835125448 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.