Integrated essay- self awareness among animals
The lecture counts some weaknesses that cast doubt on the results of the "Mark test". According to the reading passage, the "mark test" gives us reliable clues of self-awareness among chimpanzees. However, the lecturer undermines such premise by mentioning the following problems.
For the first thing, not all the studies on "mark test" have lead to consistent findings. For example, in one research only one out of eleven chimpanzees touched the mark on his face after being exposed to a mirror. This is not in accordance with the passage that says monkeys touch their facial mark more often when they see themselves in the mirror.
Furthermore, it should be considered that chimpanzees may show some behavior with or without a mirror. For example, in a study, one chimpanzee rubbed off the mark on his face even before seeing his image in the mirror. This also is inconsistent with the reading's claim that touching the mark in front of a mirror is a response to self-recognition.
Finally, self-grooming and making facial expressions may be merely a normal social behavior among the chimpanzees. No matter there is a mirror image or there is another monkey, chimpanzees try to fit into social groups by making such expressions. This refutes the passage that says self-grooming in front of a mirror is a good reason to believe that chimpanzees recognize themselves in the mirror due to self-awareness.
- Both large cars and small cars have their advantages and disadvantages Write about some of those advantages State which type of car you prefer and why 53
- visula spatial intelligence 78
- Integrated writing. 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A university education is necessary for success in this world Use reasons and specific examples to support your opinion 70
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer? 48
have lead to consistent findings.
have led to consistent findings.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 12
No. of Words: 232 250
No. of Characters: 1143 1200
No. of Different Words: 124 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.903 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.927 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.9 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 82 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 56 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 28 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.749 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.583 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.389 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.614 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.089 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4