Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The study of history is a vital part of a University’s curriculum. However, students of areas other than the study of humanity do not need to spend time on that discipline.
Although history courses can benefit students, there are many more urgent issues for a university student to face. For example, poverty-stricken students might find moonlighting to financially support their families much more valuable than learning about historical facts. College tuition and ever-rising living expenses can place much burden on people today, making seeking novelty or sating curiosity during a history class luxurious and out of practice. Also, many senior students are using internship opportunities to pave the way for their future career development. The reason is that after graduation, they will immediately face fierce competition among their peers to get the jobs they want. And when they are in an interview, previous internship experiences can offer them a much-needed edge over other candidates. Both activities help students in more pragmatic and profound ways than taking history lessons, which brings no direct benefit to them.
Furthermore, students are already busy with their coursework, and they would not have the leisure to take history classes. For example, they will need to complete assignments, attend tutorials and prepare for exams. All these coursework are the core requirements for them to graduate, and they can take up a large chunk of a student’s time. Today, we frequently see students suffer from health problems caused by deprived sleep. For them, taking history courses would worsen their already tight time budget, placing higher risks on their health conditions. Even if they can squeeze out some time for themselves, they can better utilize this scarce free time for recreation. And with sufficient rest or entertainment, they can not only complete their academic tasks more efficiently but also become physically and mentally healthier. Hence, spending time on history courses is not an efficient or healthy choice for university students.
In conclusion, taking history courses for students other than majoring in humanities is impractical and wastes their precious time.
- Some people prefer to go shopping in a big supermarket Some people prefer to go shopping in small stores near the community Which do you prefer Explain why 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Getting advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting advice from friends your same age 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should not provide financial support to artists For example painters writers or musicians and should let them support themselves Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 85
- Imagine that you want to improve your performance in order to get better grades marks at school or to get a promotion or higher pay at work You are considering the following ways Doing additional work or extra assignments beyond what is required Participa 70
- If you need to take a course which professor s course would you like to take 1 a professor who was voted the most popular 2 a professor who has just won an award for an outstanding research 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this coursework' or ''?
Suggestion: this coursework;
...nd tutorials and prepare for exams. All these coursework are the core requirements for them to g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50439882698 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84846606292 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607038123167 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2704359018 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.277777778 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9444444444 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193846762134 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734122451541 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480918316374 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137812824113 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00622344820841 0.0645574589148 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.