Movies tell a lot about a country
Some people argue that movies are not conducive to understanding about a nation. These people more or less purport to the idea that movies are based on fictional, artificial background and has limitation in intimating a country. However, in my opinion, I strongly disagree to these people and believe that movies have lots of things to tell us about a country. I will support my viewpoint with following two reasons.
First of all, a movie can describe the culture of the country which the movie is based on. To illustrate, by observing the background scenes of a movie, many things can be found out. The people’s lifestyles and their circumscribing environment are shown either implicitly or explicitly. For instance, if a person watches Korean movies, one can probably find out that guns are not allowed in Korea because it is prohibited to possess arms there. Also, viewers can observe the Korean citizens living style, which is usually living in a small apartment which is a part of a tall building. Because of the high population compared to a small territory, many Koreans live in overly dense occupied cities consisted of tall concrete buildings. Thus, viewers can learn a country’s cultural aspects when watching a movie.
Second of all, since many movies’ thesis are made of famous, meaningful events in the past, these can explain a nation’s history as well. For instance, Korea was ruled under Japan for few decades in the early 1900s and separated into two parts, South and North after the Korean war. Because of this, there are many films related to these events and historic backgrounds. Some depicts the difficulties of such times, while others delineate the normal life such as romance between couples even in such harsh times. In some cases, the plot itself is regarding a historic event which had significant meaning on the history like assassination of Korean queen by the Japanese or movement of independence against the Japan. No matter what its contents are based on or what genre it is, movies explicitly or implicitly deliver information about the nation’s past.
To conclude, it is an interesting question that whether movies tell us a lot about a country or it does not. Some says as movie being a fictionally created piece of art, it does not tell us real information about a country. However, I still believe that movies can tell us a lot about a country’s constituents and their culture as well as historic information about their nation.
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 68
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to wh 75
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas trends and concepts that help explain those facts Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reason 58
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compel 54
- Today famous people like movie stars and professional athletes have a lot of influence and sometimes they express their political views publicly such as on TV or through social media Do you think that it is good for people to be exposed to their opinions 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istoric information about their nation.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, still, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, in some cases, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2069.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97355769231 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75529743767 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545673076923 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.873019657 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.45 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357760062406 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110165628631 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150489774028 0.0737576698707 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239958026476 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19422282075 0.0645574589148 301% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.