Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
Most scientist's exposition is that it is logic that governs the rules of Nature. Starting from why the sun rises in the east to why the ocean waves breaks onto the shore differently in different environment to why we slip when we walk on wet ground is all expressed by several set of grave meaningful equations and laws. The burgeoning science and technology has infiltrated into the minds on the human to such an extent that they fail to differentiate logic and morality. Teaching morality should be the foundation of education because those are rules that governs an individual rather than the world around him. If we do not get to know ourselves and the milieu in which we live first there is no point in finding logic in this gargantuan universe and other galaxies.
Born and brought up by painstaking parents as a little womb grows up to a child he is treated gingerly and coddled by the milieu. Propriety is something that must be taught which is what morality mainly surmises. One can wish to forsake his parents when a parent does not fulfill his redundant wish to buy a new toy everyday. To the child it is logical to not desert someone he is not merry with. It might seem logical as everyone wants to be happy but is it scrupulous?
In the same way a scientist may wish to expurgate certain portions of another professor's work, add scintilla information of how he found certain portion of the work illogical and publish a journal in his own name. That is not quixotic but pragmatic. This patent show of effrontery will lead him nowhere in the field of study. The esoteric will not commend the act as furtive while the layman would only contempt the man for fooling them when the work is presented as perfidious by the luminary scientists.
So being a social human being we have responsibilities and a sense of commitment towards our family, society and for our own proper mental and physical development. Personality development comes with the gospels of morality which a baby imbibes from the first day he opens his eyes to the light of the day. It is these which characterizes a human being and makes a person presentable,approachable and reverence.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-08-17 | ShrutiUrkude | 50 | view |
2018-09-30 | kanishks95 | 50 | view |
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 50
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school:Last year, Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor, Swift Nutrition. This company serves low-fat, low-calorie meal 50
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay. 90
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep t 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favourite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes lit 50
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 381 350
No. of Characters: 1761 1500
No. of Different Words: 225 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.418 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.622 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.69 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 111 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.412 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.469 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.412 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.267 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.491 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.14 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5