Society should identify those children who have special talent and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talent.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The society today boasts a burgeoning pool of talents in which they can select from. Many though, not conspicuous, unless scrutinized for, but that doesn’t preclude the fact that we are surrounded by myriads of talents, that if early moves are not made to develop this nascent and incipient “asset”, it may gradually become evanescent and eventually vestigial in whoever possesses that talent. Some believe these young talents should be sought out for at an early age, while others would maintain the fact that they should be let alone to heuristically discover themselves. Nevertheless, I maintain the stance that young talents are to be given special attention they deserve at an early age for some reasons.
Looking at the developmental stage of humans for example, it has not only been axiomatically believed that humans rapid and effective development comes at a very young age, adolescent age to be specific, but this has also been backed up by myriads of scientific researches which have empirically shown that humans performs better in learning at very early stage, when the brain is still active in development and assimilation of whatever is “is thrown at it”. If these young talents are subjected to rigorous learning and training process at this tender age, there’s high probability that they are more likely to develop better at this age. It would not only be for their better development but this would as well give room for them to practice and be excellent in what they do at an early age. Take for instance, Mark Zukerberg, renowned for his exceptional programming skill, he is known to have started writing computer codes at a very early age. The perfection he acquired overtime could be attributed to his early exposure to programming which gives room for him to widen or expand the concept he has acquired as a kid which today has helped him to seal his place among pantheon of computer programmer despite being in his 30s yet.
One cannot completely rule out the fact that children, sometimes, also need to be left alone to heuristically discover themselves and allowed to develop on their own. This is applicable in certain talents which need the brain to be completely developed before it can be instilled or imbibed into an individual. Take Elon Musk for example, an entrepreneur almost completely unknown few decades ago, drastically pushed his way through to the top after he had acquired skills at the latter stage of his career in business.
Conclusively, one can say there are some talents which needs early exposure of a child just like it has been evinced above in the case of Mark Zukerberg, while some Talents, of course would require an individual to be fully developed mentally before they can be allowed to imbibe such talent into themselves. In order words, it is imperative for parents, individual and government bodies to carefully select a talent to be trained only when it’s right to train them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-02 | alex.ogundipe@yahoo.com | 70 | view |
- Society should identify those children who have special talent and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talent Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your r 70
- The market for the luxury goods industry is on the decline Recent reports show that a higher unemployment rate coupled with consumer fears has decreased the amount of money the average household spends on both essential and nonessential items but especial 58
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2465.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 495.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9797979798 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74322755502 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507070707071 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 783.9 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 23.0359550562 152% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.9402450083 60.3974514979 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.071428571 118.986275619 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.3571428571 23.4991977007 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28130553074 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117138981071 0.0831039109588 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383190346304 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182459492879 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470494745524 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 14.1392134831 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 12.1743820225 139% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.2143820225 143% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.