There is a view that medical subsidies should not be provided to citizens irrespective of their financial status, I completely disagree with this notion. Although, there is no doubt that it is an individual's responsibility to take care of their own well-being, in my opinion, free, strength care services are quite essential to provide good well-being for the people below the poverty line and to raise the economic growth of the country.
Firstly, free of cost medical care should be provided for the low earning society for their whole life. If not, who will take care of these people? While the government may have to allocate more budget, poor people will stay healthy and will work for themselves. For example, every 5 out of 10 homeless people dies because of a minor disease, that can be easily cured at the hospital. These tragic deaths can be minimized if the governing authorities can help them financially.
Secondly, the good fitness of working employees defines the growth of the nation as employment sectors are largely responsible for the economic growth of the country. In this present world, every working professional is doing their job relentlessly in their field such as education, fitness, office, agriculture etc. For instance, most developed nations give free health insurance to every worker, in fact, during the nationwide lockdown, some western countries donated monthly funds to critical families for food and shelter.
To conclude, the government has to take care of their citizens regardless of their buying power. Especially, the people below the poverty line and the audience who is contributing to the nation’s economy should be admissible to free medical insurance.
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for you 78
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 56
- Health care should not be provided for free regardless of a person s income The health of a person is in their own hands and they should therefore be held accountable for that Do you agree with this opinion 67
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment Why is this happening What measures can be taken to tackle this problem 56
- It s becoming more and more popular to have a year off between graduating from school and entering University Point out the advantages and disadvantages of this 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...though, there is no doubt that it is an individuals responsibility to take care of their ow...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o provide good well-being for the people below the poverty line and to raise the ...
^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ho will take care of these people? While the government may have to allocate more...
^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al. These tragic deaths can be minimized if the governing authorities can help th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in fact, no doubt, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24087591241 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78116558052 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602189781022 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7705682869 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327351856276 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113118761472 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775540342816 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192505783364 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456339876678 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.