More and more people today are choosing to eat only healthy food and are making time to exercise regularly. Why is this? What can be done to encourage other people to eat only healthy food and to make time to exercise regularly?
A healthy lifestyle, including smart eating habits and regular exercise, has become an unstoppable trend. This essay will discuss the rationale behind this trend and possible actions to encourage people to pick up these habits.
The rise in the popularity of healthy foods and physical activities could be attributed to social media. Social media interventions can positively change physical activity and diet-related behaviours, such as increases in physical activity levels, healthy modifications to food intake, and beneficial changes to body composition or body weight. Social networking sites users share photos of their meals or daily exercise on their social websites, and these users include nutritionists, chefs, health experts, or personal trainers. Evidence shows that more than seventy percent of people who use social media are affected by the posts on social networking platforms and automatically imitate those whom they follow.
There are several ultimate proposed methods to make the general public healthier. Policymakers, professionals, organisations, and researchers would choose the design of future social media intervention, which has a powerful effect on its users as the above-mentioned arguments. With a simple sponsored social media post from the right person, governments could inspire people to follow healthy eating behaviours or sedentary onlookers to exercise more. Affordable access to healthcare, advancement of medical treatment, enforcement of food safety, or an increase in the number of sports facilities would also be optimal ways to improve public health.
In conclusion, greater cultural awareness of nutrition and exercise through social media has made a big impact on people, and with the right actions from governments and local authorities, these types of behaviours could be adopted by many people.
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment Why is this the case and what solutions are possible 78
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment Why is this the case and what solutions are possible 78
- In some countries if people need to find work they have to move away from their families and their friends Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- More and more people today are choosing to eat only healthy food and are making time to exercise regularly Why is this What can be done to encourage other people to eat only healthy food and to make time to exercise regularly 78
- In some countries if people need to find work they have to move away from their families and their friends Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...l ultimate proposed methods to make the general public healthier. Policymakers, professionals,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79120879121 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0088760266 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637362637363 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2735029419 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.727272727 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209623247112 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780256842753 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498258322657 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119085818031 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498539737796 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.