hazard of glass on birds
The passage presents possible solutions for the hazardous impact of glass used in buildings on birds due to their inability to distinguish between glass and open air. The lecturer disregards all the ideas presented in the text and believes none of them are effective. His further demonstrations are as follows.
Firstly, one-way glass cannot be an efficient tool because it will act as a mirror in the eyes of the birds, and birds do not comprehend the concept of a mirror. The reflection of the sky or a tree in a mirror seems like the thing itself to them. Subsequently, the bird will fly right into the one-way glass as well as the regular glass.
Secondly, painting colorful lines on windows will not be the practical means to protect the birds either. The unpainted areas between the lines will be perceived as holes by the birds and they will try to fly through these holes. With the purpose of avoiding this threat, the holes would have to be made very small, which results in substantially dark interior space of the buildings.
Finally, an artificial magnetic field is not an effective equipment because birds employ their magnetic sense in long trips, for instance, travelling from a cold country to a warm country in winter. On the contrary, when they are on a short journey like a trip from one side of the city to the other, birds utilize their sense of sight and brightness. Hence, making the artificial magnetic field an unhelpful tool as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-27 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 76 | view |
- TPO 22 integrated Ethanol is as like as gasoline with no benefits 80
- TPO05the great houses were used for three main reasons people lived in themthey stored foods in themthey were used as ceremonial centers 86
- new kind of broccoli on the east coast 80
- TPO 17 independent agree or not most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are 76
- TPO 16 Integrated the archaeology science is in danger in Britain because of three reasons many artifacts were lost in construction projects many professionals feel that financial support for their research is inadequate it is difficult to have a career i 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78346456693 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59870256215 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57874015748 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2275523728 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.25 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307313742271 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969068380418 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124013309404 0.0662205650399 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169267067674 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934306335646 0.0443174109184 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78346456693 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59870256215 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57874015748 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2275523728 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.25 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307313742271 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969068380418 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124013309404 0.0662205650399 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169267067674 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934306335646 0.0443174109184 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.