The issue of whether medical research projects should be carried by private companies and individuals or the government is the one that needs to be looked at carefully. These days, there has been a growing body of opinion that people do not believe the pharmaceutical companies and they want the government to conduct medical research projects. It is true that those companies carry out research projects to gain a profit. However, I completely agree with the viewpoint that private companies and individuals should be the ones that execute medical research projects, and in this essay I will present the reasons for my view, which are that private companies have more resources to conduct medical projects and the government has some pressing problems to take care of.
To begin with, one of the most compelling reasons for holding my view is that private companies or individuals have more resources, such as leading scientists and a lucrative financial budget, to carry on medical research projects. Besides, they can decide to start any project quickly. As a result, it has been widely demonstrated that one clear advantage of leveraging private companies in researching medical projects is the result in a short duration. There is strong evidence to show that there is a connection between the increased number of private companies participating in a medical research project and the reduction in the time needed to deliver the result of a project. A good example of this is Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, which simultaneously researched the mRNA vaccine for COVID-19, and delivered the vaccine in less than a year. That is why people should not overlook the critical role of private pharmaceutical companies. In short, it helps to demonstrate the advantages of medical research projects funded by private companies.
Another convincing reason for my position is that the government cannot do everything. This is due to the fact that the government has a limit on spending the national budget. They have to consider which medical research projects should have the highest priority. In addition, the government have some pressing problems such as public healthcare and education which needs to be allocate budget. As a result, those mentioned reasons could lead to a hesitation in making decision to start any medical studying project. Moreover, if the government invests money in every project, the delivered results may be worse. This is why the government should focus on some high-priority projects such as improving healthcare services or building facilities for schools. In short, the government should spend money on some urgent national issues and let private companies fund the medical research projects.
By way of conclusion, I believe that private companies have both financial and personnel resources to perform medical research projects, and the government cannot spend money on every project because of the limitations of the national budget. Therefore, it seems to me that medical research projects should be sponsored by private companies or individuals, and the government should focus on some crucial problems of the country.
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 73
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central 68
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 79
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town — Adams Realty and Fitch Realty — Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, in short, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2657.0 1615.20841683 164% => OK
No of words: 499.0 315.596192385 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3246492986 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91045720834 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.418837675351 0.561755894193 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 817.2 506.74238477 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3423753765 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.523809524 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7619047619 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09523809524 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409587556 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145962871449 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790656321033 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297992901614 0.151304729494 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377473236869 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.