Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution; however, others think there are some other ways.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
The impediments in transport and commute have assuaged to a great extent. However, it has aggravated the environmental conditions. To this, where some people consider having an international car-free as an effective measure, I consider it wouldn’t be a very substantial way of mitigating the menace of environment.
The population has been soaring higher than ever before and so is the proportional growth of technological advancements. The more is science proliferating, the lesser arduous has life become and more facile and luxurious we have made it in all grades of life, unfortunately, downgrading the most prime resource, our environment. The cars, the buses, the means of transport have immensely mushroomed exacerbating the quality of the air we breathe. The people who believe going with a particular car-free day often contend that would decrease the pollution and intensity of the smoke and hazardous pollutants released from the incomplete combustion. Hence, taking a day off from cars would be extenuating loads of such contaminants which are detrimental to the respiration of our environment.
The other significant argument contradicts that such measures would be barely efficacious in rendering protection to the environment. It would just be a negligible halt in dissuading the pace of atmospheric contaminants. It would rather impede the day to day routine activities which might curb the economy to a certain extent as from the environmental protection perspective, it wouldn’t really be an effectual practice. Following Euro-5 norms and other effective guidelines alike would be much more beneficial. Usage of CNGs, taking care of complete combustion and using less hazardous constituents in manufacturing the means of transportation are better alternatives.
Conclusively, it could be summed up that with respect to the extent of pollution that is prevalent at present, going for one-day prevention is rather inept.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-29 | Taytor2609 | 67 | view |
| 2022-03-08 | vuhieuquy | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-07 | lien sunny | 78 | view |
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 87
- The plans show how a coastal land has developed into a coastal park 71
- The table below shows the prices of a cup of coffee in 6 cities in Australia in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things What is your opinion 74
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two contries on consumer goods in 2010 pounds sterlng 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e most prime resource, our environment. The cars, the buses, the means of transport...
^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ting the quality of the air we breathe. The people who believe going with a particu...
^^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally be an effectual practice. Following Euro-5 norms and other effective guideli...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, really, so, with respect to, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58783783784 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37685776589 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587837837838 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.002604096 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.142857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162398364095 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476431145946 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645027999185 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956811343631 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525662942957 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e most prime resource, our environment. The cars, the buses, the means of transport...
^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ting the quality of the air we breathe. The people who believe going with a particu...
^^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally be an effectual practice. Following Euro-5 norms and other effective guideli...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, really, so, with respect to, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58783783784 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37685776589 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587837837838 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.002604096 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.142857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162398364095 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476431145946 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645027999185 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956811343631 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525662942957 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.