The issue of recycling waste from homes is the one that needs to be looked at carefully. These days, there is a growing body of opinion that people think the amount of waste from households that is recycled is not substantial. Therefore, many people hold the opinion that the government should issue a law to increase recycling. However, I completely disagree with this viewpoint, and in this essay I will present the reasons for my view, which are that individuals have their own decisions to increase the amount of waste that needs to be recycled and that education should play a more important role in encouraging people to recycle more of their waste.
To begin with, one of the most compelling reasons for holding my view is that people have the right to choose whether they want to increase the amount of recycled waste. This is due to the fact that people should be free to live their lives and forcing them to do so is actually a form of violation of basic human rights. A good example of this is that I love to protect the environment so much that I usually categorize different types of waste before dumping the trash into the bin. Besides, I have paid the waste management fee every month. If there is a law that forces me to recycle more of the waste, I feel that my right is violated. That is why I do not think the government should force citizens to increase recycling. In short, it helps to demonstrate that people have the right to choose whether they want to recycle more of their waste and that imposing a law is not an appropriate solution.
Another convincing reason for my position is that people may not understand the advantages of increasing the amount of recycled waste. This is because education currently focuses too much on academic training and does not offer sufficient teaching on courses related to the environment and recycling. As a result, students would not learn the value of preserving their living environment. This would lead to a decline in the awareness of protecting the environment. In my opinion, educationalists should include in the curriculum various courses that broaden students’ vision and outlook about the environment and how to preserve it by recycling more waste. In short, education should play a vital role in promoting people to recycle more of their waste.
By way of conclusion, I believe that the government should not consider basic human rights before approving a law related to recycling more of the waste since people are free to choose whether they want to do that or not, and education could be a better solution in increasing the awareness of citizens about protecting the environment and recycling more waste. Therefore, it seems to me that a new law is not the proper way to make people recycle more of their waste.
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents i 75
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 83
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at 50
- Art classes such as painting or drawing are important for children's development, so it should be compulsory in high school. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, i feel, in short, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 7.30460921844 301% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 57.0 24.0651302605 237% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2313.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 485.0 315.596192385 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76907216495 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6872347751 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.40824742268 0.561755894193 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 732.6 506.74238477 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.7250285005 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.736842105 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5263157895 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15789473684 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412340887676 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142419687037 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940296404279 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293255150556 0.151304729494 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884041372883 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.