The chart below shows the expenditure of two contries on consumer goods in 2010.( pounds sterlng)
The bar chart compares the price of two different countries for five products in the year 2010.
It is clear that cars were the most bought item in the UK and in France, UK was the country bought more. The most significant expense was cameras.
In the UK, cars were bought most in both of countries with 450,000 pounds in the UK and £400,000 in France, this figure was £50,000 lower than in the UK. Bristish spent more money to buy book than French accounted for £400,00 and £300,000 respectively. The third data was computers took up almost £400,00 in France and £350,000 in the UK.
People in the UK spent more than 1/2 amount of cameras than French comprised £350,000 and £150,000. Perfume was the least bought in both of contries at £200,00 in France while Bristish spent almost £150,000, £50,000 lower than in France. Obviously people in the UK have spent more money than the French and there are even some very large money disparities items.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-03 | Taytor2609 | 56 | view |
- The chart shows the average number of hours each day that Chinese American Turkish and Brazilian tourists spent doing leisure activities while on holiday in Greece in August 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and m 84
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 70
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- Computers are becoming an essential part of school lessons Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and give your own opinion 73
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two contries on consumer goods in 2010 pounds sterlng 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third, while, even so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 794.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72619047619 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35774403108 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529761904762 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9974112818 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2222222222 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0428233652619 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0234764827408 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469836173903 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0460207431986 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614142619615 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.5 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.